Bernard Bolter

All Artwork

smoothism.com

ArtworkBioCVStatementContact
Oranienburger Tor . 1867

Oranienburger Tor . 1867

2017

Mixed media on canvas

80cm x 80cm

31 1/2" x 31 1/2"
Medium
Mixed media on canvas
Dimensions
/
80cm × 80cm
Scale
Medium
Year
2017
Made in
Berlin
Series
A Colorful History

Private collection

Shown at Prem Arts, 2017

Sold at Kunstmarkt Museumsinsel, 2022, for €400

● Documented fact

If you own this work, get in touch. I'll add you to the record and officially connect you to its history.

BB-ACH-2017-007

Record fully catalogued via Art/Official

Last updated August 2026

In the practice

Painted during Bernard's 3-month scouting trip to Berlin in 2017, in the same studio sublet and same painting batch as Brandenburger Tor . 1899. Marks the transition from the ACH San Francisco style to the Berlin style. Shown at Prem Arts during that trip.

Process

One of the first eight Gates of Perception paintings, all made in the same batch during a month-long studio sublet on Reichenberger Straße in 2017. Departs from the rest of that batch: the lower-left corner was left intentionally unfinished — bare canvas visible, light pencil sketching still showing, and the sidewalk curb line left as a raw brushstroke rather than the clean straight second pass Bernard typically applies. This was a conscious decision, not an interruption — a first, contained test of the deconstruction idea before it became the explicit approach for the series' second batch of eight.

In the series

CORRECTION to the deconstruction-origin timeline previously recorded on Brandenburger Tor . 1899: this painting, one of the first eight (nominally 'fully painted') Gates works, contains a deliberate, conscious first test of the deconstruction approach — the unfinished lower-left corner — made while the idea was still forming around the move to Berlin. The deconstruction impulse was therefore present from the start of the series, not something that began only with the second batch of eight paintings. This record is the origin point; Brandenburger Tor's record should be flagged to reflect this.

Source material

Historical photograph of Oranienburger Tor, Berlin, taken by court photographer Friedrich Albert Schwartz, dated 1867 — the same year the gate was demolished. One of a small pool of historical gate photographs Bernard found during the 2017 trip; sourced via Wikimedia Commons (file: Berlin Oranienburger Tor Schwartz 1867.jpg).

Vision Analysis

The composition is dominated by an expanse of flat, even blue occupying more than half the frame, pressing the horizon line low and giving the image a held, suspended quality before any architectural or figurative content appears. Below this sky, a grayscale photographic image sits embedded in the lower portion of the canvas, itself less than half the total picture height, depicting a monumental stone gate structure with triple arched openings, a central pediment bearing a coat of arms, and a tall central spire or obelisk rising above the roofline, flanked by receding streetscape with rowhouses, a chimney, and small figures suggested at a distance. The grayscale register of this photographic zone sits in direct tension with the flat saturated blue above it and the several solid-colored geometric fields that interrupt and border it. Four distinct painted color blocks intervene across the lower register: a dark, almost black-green triangular mass occupies the left side, its diagonal edge cutting against the pale ground plane beneath; a smaller warm peach or cream rectangular block sits nested within the green field, abutting the edge of the photographic image; on the right side, a warm burnt-orange trapezoidal block and a cooler mauve or plum-toned rectangular block sit adjacent to one another, both reading as flattened, angled planes rather than receding architectural volumes. These four painted fields do not obviously represent legible structures — they read as color incursions laid over or beside the photographic ground, their edges following diagonal, non-orthogonal lines that suggest an implied perspective without resolving into one. The palette overall is cool and restrained apart from these four accents: the sky's saturated cerulean blue, the neutral grays and off-whites of the photographic image and the foreground pavement, and the near-black deep green at left, set against the two warmer accent blocks (peach, orange) and the dusk-toned mauve at right. The mood produced is quiet, still, and slightly disorienting — the vast empty sky above a comparatively small and dense lower band creates a sense of imbalance or waiting, while the flat, shadowless application of the painted color blocks resists the illusionistic depth suggested by the photographic content beneath them. Formally, the surface shows two distinct registers of mark-making: the photographic zone reads as a transferred or reproduced image, its grain and tonal gradation consistent with a mechanically reproduced source, while the four color blocks are applied as flat, uninflected fields of paint, with hard rather than blended edges where they meet the photographic ground. This produces a clear visual seam between "captured" image and "applied" paint, coexisting within the same surface without either fully absorbing the other — a visual cue toward two distinct temporal or material registers meeting in a single frame, one that reads as historical record and one that reads as present-tense intervention. What resists confident description is the logic governing the four color blocks themselves: they do not map cleanly onto any legible architectural or shadow structure visible in the photographic image, and their function — whether as invented structures, abstracted shadow, or a purely compositional device — is not visually resolvable from the image alone.

View all analyses →