Soft Power, AKA Venice in the Middle
2025
Collage
50cm x 70cm
19 5/8" x 27 1/2"
Status & ownership
Currently in artist's studio, Berlin
Contribution
Venice in the Middle marks a formal departure within Bolter's practice — a transfer painting that uses the acrylic gel medium technique not as a resolved method but as a site of experiment. Where A Colorful History works typically anchor one historical photograph in clean painted fields, this work layers multiple transfers from different series, geographies, and decades, with paint assertive enough to partially override the image sources. The work extends the logic of the Kottbusser Tor painting — where a dominant colour block asserts itself over the photographic surface — into a more complex, multi-layered composition. It is also formally self-referential: a Rietveld-era transfer painting becomes source material for a 2025 transfer painting, making Bolter's own practice the primary art-historical reference. The result is less a resolved transfer painting than a demonstration of the method under pressure — and a document of the moment when Breaking Down Art's multi-transfer logic re-emerged from the rubble of a failed commission canvas.
About the work
Transfer painting built from a failed Oslo canvas — the exact size requested for a Berlin group show. Multiple acrylic transfers are layered: a faded Oslo cityscape, a Rietveld-era painting using 2007 Venice Biennale photographs, a 1906 San Francisco earthquake aerial, and leftover WWII source photographs — held together with assertive colour fields. Venice in the Middle began with a failure: a transfer of an Oslo street scene onto a 50×70cm canvas where the fine detail didn't come through. After sanding it smooth and trying again on the bottom with the same result, Bolter decided to experiment rather than abandon the canvas — it happened to be exactly the format requested for a group show at Freiluft Kunst Klub Berlin (FKKB) at Hotel Berlin. Working quickly and materially, Bolter gathered laser prints lying around the studio: transfers from past paintings and leftover WWII source photographs that hadn't made it into the war paintings series. These became the elements on the canvas, and the question became whether composition could be worked out through paint around them. The result is structured in horizontal bands. At the bottom, the Oslo street scene transfer — imperfect, detail-less. Behind and above it, a faded ghost of the same Oslo photograph from the first failed attempt. In the middle, a transfer of a Rietveld Akademie painting that itself used photographs taken at the 2007 Venice Biennale — a painting within a painting, process folding back on itself. At the top, a 1906 San Francisco aerial disaster photograph taken from a balloon camera, sourced from an earlier SF painting. In the corners, WWII documentary photographs — offcuts from the war paintings, the first moment Bolter returned to layering multiple transfers on a single canvas since art school. Around and between all of this: assertive colour fields — a large black circle, rust and red verticals, cream, salmon, and purple blocks — given more authority than in a typical A Colorful History transfer painting. The paint does not illustrate the photographs; it navigates around them and at times overrides them. The work spans more than a hundred years of image time: 1906 San Francisco, 2007 Venice, the WWII archive, the failed Oslo present. It is also a private archive — Bolter's own practice layered onto itself, his student work becoming art-historical material. The subtitle, arrived at in retrospect: A Painting in a Painting over 100 Years.
Intent
To use a failed transfer canvas as an opportunity to experiment — layering transfers from past paintings and pushing the painted color fields to dominate rather than support the photographic source material. The question was whether composition could be worked out through paint around a set of pre-existing image elements.
Making
Made quickly and experimentally after a failed Oslo transfer — the initial transfer didn't bring through the fine detail, so sanded it smooth and tried again on the bottom with the same result. Decided to experiment rather than abandon the canvas. Grabbed a bunch of laser prints that were lying around — transfers from past paintings and leftover WWII source photographs — and worked out the composition with paint around them. The process was material-led, not preconceived.
Where it went
Wasn't sure going in whether the paint dominating the image would work — but it did. Can see the thread back to Kottbusser Tor and how a large dominant color block can dictate the image. The result was a surprise in the right direction.
In the practice
Submitted to a group show at Freiluft Kunst Klub Berlin (FKKB) at Hotel Berlin, Berlin — an end-of-year group show with around 20 artists, each asked to make a 50×70cm painting. The canvas was already that size from the failed Oslo transfer, so the work went from experiment to submission. Was shown and well received.
What this isn't
Pushing away from the traditional ACH technique — one photograph, clean paint blocks. Wanted to experiment with multiple layered transfers and let the paint be more assertive and less controlled.
In the series
Grew out of a failed attempt at an Oslo transfer painting — part of an expansion of A Colorful History beyond San Francisco and Berlin into wealthier European cities (Oslo, Zurich) that might be more commercially viable. Neither the Oslo nor Zurich paintings were finished; the direction is now morphing toward the Mediums of Perception sub-series. The failed canvas became an opportunity to experiment with layering transfers from past paintings. The work connects back to the two Breaking Down Art paintings made at the Rietveld Akademie — the first time multiple photos were transferred to a single canvas.
The primary art-historical reference is Bolter's own earlier work — a transfer painting made at the Gerrit Rietveld Akademie, Amsterdam, itself a mixed transfer and acrylic painting using photographs from the 2007 Venice Biennale visit. That painting becomes both source material and historical layer in this work, making Bolter's own practice the art-historical frame. The logic connects to Richard Hamilton's collage approach — image layers coexisting without one explaining the other — and to the Kottbusser Tor painting within the Gates of Perception series, where a dominant painted color block asserts itself over the photographic source.
Visual Similarity
Works with similar visual structure, found by comparing image embeddings across the archive.
Explore visual embeddings →Vision Analysis
The composition is a tall vertical field organized as a stacked, interleaved sequence of photographic fragments and flat geometric planes of color. A band of clear sky blue caps the image, beneath which a black-and-white aerial photograph of a dense waterborne city spreads with ragged, brushed edges, as though the image were dragged or scraped into place rather than cleanly framed. Below it, a second grayscale photograph — a broad flooded thoroughfare reflecting building facades — dissolves downward into a pale gray wash. The middle register is held by a horizontal gray band containing tiny photographic figures: a gallery interior with framed pictures on walls and small visitors standing among them, rendered at a scale that makes the surrounding color planes feel architectural. The lower third is anchored by a large black-and-white street scene of an early-industrial city — tram tracks curving through the roadway, a streetcar, pedestrians in period dress, ornate multi-story facades with awnings and painted hotel signage. The palette splits into two registers that never fully merge: the photographic material stays in silvery grayscale, while the painted geometry carries flat, unmodulated color — sky blue, warm cream, muted lavender, salmon pink, olive green, burnt orange, deep navy, and a narrow vertical stripe of red, green, and ochre running like a seam down the left-center. The flat shapes behave like architecture of their own: a black trapezoid leaning into the composition at left, a dark arched form suggesting a dome at lower left, a pink silhouette at right that reads as a building profile. Tonal weight sits low and left, with the darkest masses gathered there, while the upper right stays light and open. Several distinct moments coexist in the frame without hierarchy or resolution. The street scene at bottom belongs to the era of trams and horse carts. The aerial city view and the flooded avenue read as mid-twentieth-century documentary photography. Two small color photographs interrupt the grayscale: a cluster of soldiers in fatigues huddled at the lower left edge, and, in the bottom right corner over an olive ground, helicopters hovering above figures in a field — imagery with the color cast of 1960s war reportage. The gallery visitors in the middle band appear contemporary. These periods are not blended; each retains its own photographic grain, tonality, and edge quality, laid adjacent or overlapping so the eye moves between decades within a few centimeters. Technically, the surface shows the marks of transfer or screen-based processes: the photographs have scraped, incomplete edges, drag lines, and areas where the emulsion or ink appears thinned to translucency, letting underlying color ghost through. The painted areas are hard-edged and matte by contrast, with clean seams where color meets photograph. Faint vertical streaking runs through the flooded-street passage, ambiguous between deliberate mark and process residue. What resists confident description is the spatial logic of the middle band: the gray plane the gallery figures stand on reads simultaneously as a floor, a rooftop, and a horizontal slab floating in front of the flooded scene, and the image offers no cue to settle which. Similarly, the vertical tricolor stripe functions as both a painted abstraction and something flag-like or mast-like, and its role in the pictorial space stays open.
View all analyses →


